What is new in .NET 11, and should you move from .NET 10?
A fair tour of .NET 11 and C# 15 as released on 10 November 2026, the breaking changes to read first, and a decision guide for production teams on .NET 10.
· 7 min readA calm first-week plan for when the person who built your business software has left: what to find out, what to secure, who owns the risk, and what can wait.

The person who built your system has left. Perhaps it was a freelancer who took a permanent job, a small agency that wound down, or a member of staff who handed in their notice a month ago. The system still works. People still use it. But you have just realised that nobody is looking after it, and you are not sure who would know what to do if it stopped.
Many organisations find themselves here, and it is fixable. The first week is not about fixing anything. It is about finding out what you have, securing the basics and writing it down, so that every decision after that rests on facts rather than guesses.
The most useful instruction is the hardest: do not change anything yet. No updates, no clean-ups, no "quick tidy" of the server. Software that has run quietly for years may depend on settings nobody remembers. A well-meant change made without understanding is how a working system becomes a broken one.
You also do not need to panic. A system that worked yesterday still works today. You have time to be methodical.
Start with plain questions, and write down the answers as you get them:
Talk to the people who use it every day. They often know more about how the system really behaves than any document does.
Now find out who holds the keys. These are the questions that cause the most trouble when nobody can answer them:
You are not changing the system here. You are building a list of what exists and who controls it.
The source code is the written form of your system. If you own the software, you should be able to get hold of it. Check your contract, though: if a freelancer or agency wrote it, paying for it does not by itself make you the owner of the code, and the handover is much easier if the contract says it does. Ask where it lives: a source-control service such as GitHub or Azure DevOps, a folder on the developer's laptop, or a copy on the server.
If you find it, ask someone technical, or an independent engineer, to check one thing: can it be built into a working copy of the system, away from the live one? If it can, you are in a far stronger position. If the code is missing, or does not match what is running, that is important to know now. It does not have to be a disaster, but it changes your options.
Pull everything into a single page. It does not need to be elegant. Include:
The last item matters most. A page that says "we do not know X" is more useful than silence, because it shows you exactly what to ask next.
Within the organisation, someone should be named as responsible for this system: not to look after it technically, but to make sure somebody does. In many organisations that is the operations director or finance director. Give it a name, put it on the page and tell the board or owners it exists.
This also answers questions that auditors, insurers and customers are likely to ask sooner or later: who looks after this, and what happens if it fails?
You can do the first week yourself, and most of it needs no technical knowledge. At the end of it, you will probably want an independent opinion on three things: whether the code and hosting are in a healthy state, whether anything is out of support, and what you would need in place to look after the system properly.
That is the job a software health audit is built for. It looks at one system, tells you plainly what condition it is in, and sets out a sensible order of work. It also gives you an informed view before you choose a supplier, whether that is us or someone else.
If you are already planning for the next time, a handover checklist for when a developer leaves, which we will cover in a later article, is the preventive version of everything above.
Start by asking one person to find out who holds the administrator logins for the system, and where it is hosted and paid for. Those two answers resolve the largest share of the early risk, and they take an afternoon. Then start the one-page summary.
If you would like an engineer to look at your system, a software health audit is a good place to start. If the system needs someone to look after it month by month, that is what our software care service is for.

A fair tour of .NET 11 and C# 15 as released on 10 November 2026, the breaking changes to read first, and a decision guide for production teams on .NET 10.
· 7 min read
As of 10 November 2026, .NET 8 and .NET 9 no longer get security fixes. What has changed, what has not, and a calm 30-day plan for software on them.
· 4 min read
How a non-technical owner can decide what comes first on a product roadmap: plain criteria, simple scoring, outcome-based thinking, and saying no with reasons.
· 6 min read